Is Vaping Health Risky?
The author examines the possible social and health benefits of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electronic cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the different possibilities for teens in light to the fact that smoking has turned into a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should think about the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also considering the dangers of nicotine addiction. The writer also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I agree with her that e-cigarette vaporizers certainly are a harmless option to smoking, if used correctly.
Almost all of the data on smoking and its own risks comes from adults, which helps it be hard to assess the way the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It’s estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths each year are due to smoking. This figure is likely an underestimation, since many deaths may be the result of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that people who smoke don’t intend to do so.
The author suggests that we should consider the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the effect of tobacco products, while providing a much less harmful experience. The problem with this approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking would be to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that people who utilize the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that originates from this is that because e smokers don’t feel any of the physical effects of smoking, they can’t be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it’s important to remember that smoking cigarettes and using vaporizers are both very similar behaviors. What makes vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to have the same effect as smoking, without the associated risks. Vaporizing provides a highly similar experience as smoking cigarettes. This means that vapers could be increasing their likelihood of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they’re taking steps in the direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the chance of enjoying a wholesome lifestyle.
The author makes some valid points about the dangers of smoking cigarettes. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of carbon monoxide smoke. However, his real issue is one of regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be allowed to advertise their products as safe when all they will have done is increase the level of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The issue with this argument is that we have already seen the unwanted effects of increased levels of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We curently have countless reports about the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers attempting to quit. We already have Novo 2 plenty of stories about the rise of cancers and respiratory problems caused by long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been an important factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths in the last few years.
The writer does not may actually recognize the irony of arguing against smoking by way of a healthier alternative, but doesn’t seem to consider the potential negative health ramifications of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually turn back to cigarette smoking. He appears to think that all we must do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the amount of nicotine we take in. The truth is that smokers who try to quit often do so due to other medical issues, and aren’t just turning to the cigarettes to get away from their bad habits. There are several reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored every one of them in his arguments against vaping.
Although it holds true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, a number of the chemicals found in cigarette smoking are located in the smokes. The author seems to be of the fact that all we need to do to solve the problem of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we ingest through our lungs. The argument he presents is simply not based in sound scientific fact. There is absolutely no real proof that reducing the amount of chemicals we ingest improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the theory that the cigarettes are less dangerous than regular cigarettes because they don’t contain the harmful chemicals found in regular cigarettes.